Wednesday, July 4, 2012

3 Great Questions to Ask Your HR Business Partner Candidates


One of the most common questions I am asked is: “Do you know anyone who’d be great for our open HR Business Partner role?”
And it’s no surprise. As more and more companies “transform” their HR function, the need for a specific-type of HR generalist has become more acute. And the aggressive networking (“who do you know for this job?“) underscores a talent problem we have in our industry: the dramatic need for strategic HR partners.
Many companies thought that announcing a new organizational structure and changing titles would be enough to “transform” the function. But now it’s clear that those changes have no bearing on whether the incumbents can really do the job. Hence, the flurry of interviewing as the role sees more and more attrition and the struggle continues to match a person to this new, sometime ambiguous, and challenging role.

Assessment determines the best fit

We’ve done a lot of work in the area of HR Business Partner competencies – and make no bones about the fact that assessment, rather than old school interviewing, is the best way to determine whether a person is the right fit for the role. But even if you have access to an HRBP-specific assessment program, interviewing can still provide valuable insight into the skills, experience, and mindset of these candidates. If you do it right.
Here are some questions we recommend. But remember – as obvious as it might seem – the important and challenging aspect of interviewing is evaluating the candidates’ answers based on the needs of the position – not just asking great questions.
 1. Have you ever built a talent strategy to support an organization’s business strategy?[If so, describe how you went about doing it. What was your approach? What stakeholders did you work most closely with? What was the outcome? How did you measure success?] If not, describe how you’d go about doing it. Which stakeholders would be most important to work with? What outcomes would you want to achieve? How would you evaluate the effectiveness of your strategy?
Answers to look for:
  • A cogent approach to understanding the near-term business strategy (plan for growth, new products or services, infrastructure requirements, etc. – and how those map those to specific talent needs.)
  • A practical method for assessing the existing talent in the organization and identifying where gaps exist and the criticality of those gaps.
  • A plan for closing the gap using a multi-pronged approach such as build, borrow, buy, etc.
  • A partnership mindset in which close ties to – and input from – the business leaders is leveraged throughout the process.
  • An objective way to measure results through decreased vacancy rates for mission critical roles, higher rates of successful internal promotions, reduced attrition in key parts of the business, higher customer service ratings, etc.

An important strategy

2Tell me about a situation in which you took an unpopular stand on what you believed represented an important strategy for your business, and you were able to convince others who initially disagreed with you. What was the situation, what did you do, and what was the outcome?
Answers to look for:
  • A strategic situation that impacts talent in the organization (e.g., candidate pipeline, employees’ access to social media, driving support for new technology, etc.) – versus a tactical, old-school HR issue.
  • A knowledge of economic, industry and business trends.
  • A willingness to take risks and an ability to influence others.
  • A sense of confidence, smarts and initiative.
  • The ability to make data-based decisions and recommendations, and assess the ROI of business outcomes.

 An approach to managing work

3. Describe your approach to managing the range of work an HRBP faces – from strategic to tactical. What process do you use? What resources do you leverage? How do you know you’re focusing on the things and driving the right results?
Answers to look for:
  • A structured approach to prioritizing work, managing time, following up, and staging deadlines
  • A creative method for managing resources, delegating tactical issues, using web-based (even free) tools for task and project management, regular updates with peers, business leaders or direct reports to manage the right priorities, a process for managing expectations of business leaders regarding their role and responsibilities.
  • A business-based approach for working proactively vs. reactively – e.g., attending business updates, field visits with leaders, keeping up the financials of the business, etc.
  • An openness to feedback in which their input, deliverables and value to the business is assessed through surveys, interviews, objective measures, etc.
This is a start to matching HR Business Partner candidates to leaders who are demanding value from these strategic roles. And a challenging, position-relevant job interview is a great place to start.

By Linda Brenner is Managing Director of Designs on Talent,

4 New Ways of Dealing with Difficult People


Think of the format of a Master Card commercial. In dealing with difficult people we have insanity, what’s typical, and then the priceless solution — or in this case 4 priceless solutions.
So, there’s insanity, or dealing with difficult people in the same old way and expecting them to do something different. There’s our typical response of labeling difficult people for easy description when we talk about them, and then there’s the priceless solution: using new labels that remind you to treat them in new ways so that you get different results!
So the priceless solution is for you, not the difficult person. We all know that the only person’s behavior you can change is yours so keep that in mind here and use these new labels to remind yourself how YOU can adjust your behavior when dealing with others in the workplace you’ve decided are difficult.

4 ways to describe difficult people

There are four new ways of describing them: Divas, Dragons, Detectives, and Drop Outs. Each label corresponds to our CORE Profile Personality Preferences, but also gives you a clue about what is creating the need for their difficult behavior and what is motivating them — both of which you can then directly address.
  • Divas – these are likely entertainer types motivated by a need for attention. Give them some and they get less difficult. The only reason they might appear to be a diva is because they are in an attention deficit and that causes them stress.
  • Dragons – these are likely commander types motivated by getting things done. Help them be more efficient and get immediate results and they’ll quit breathing fire down your neck. The only reason they do is stress makes them want to control the snot out of everything and barking orders is perceived to be a way to control.
  • Detectives – these are likely the more linear organizer preferences motivated and driven to do things right. With enough stress they become vigilant around details – give them as many facts and figures as you can find that are relevant and then give them time.Columbo could solve a murder in under an hour, but these guys need time to process and the more stress and pressure and less details, the more time they’ll take to figure out the “mystery”.
  • Drop Outs – these are likely your relater preferences who withdraw and close up when conflict arises and folks stop getting along. They need stability, certainty, reassurance, and harmony and if you can provide those or send them somewhere where there is more of that, the stress and disengagement will disappear.
Want to make all of your difficulties disappear? Add to these four simple strategies by understanding who YOU are, who THEY are and how your needs and styles might differ, but both have value and can be powerful when properly motivated, accepted and addressed.
By Monica Wofford, CSP, is a leadership development strategist, blogger, speaker, and author of Contagious Leadership and Make Difficult People Disappear

3 Things That HR Professionals Should Stop Apologizing For


Fast Company magazine recently had an article titled “3 Things Professional Women Should Stop Apologizing For,“ which were:
  1. Their financial expectations (I.E., pay us the same!)
  2. Their physical appearance (I.E., Sorry we aren’t club ready – I was up with a sick kid all night!)
  3. Their professional accomplishments (I.E., Just because I’m a woman doesn’t mean I can’t brag about what I do great!)

Things to stop apologizing for

It’s a great article, and this got me thinking about all things we “Apologize for in HR that we should stop apologizing for,” so here’s my Top 3 Things HR Pros should stop apologizing for:
  1. You getting fired! Oh boy, this could be #1, #2 and #3! I can’t tell you how many HR folks I’ve trained over the past 20 years that I’ve specifically said, “When you let this person go – don’t apologize!” I mean truly, what are you saying? — “I’m sorry you are terrible at your job, or made the decision to sexually harass your co-worker – you’re fired!”When you really think about it, it sounds funny.
  2. You not getting promoted. This is almost the same as apologizing for getting fired. Instead of apologizing to someone for not getting promoted, how about you give them a great development plan so they can actually get promoted? Organizations can be big hairy breathing things; sometimes decisions are made and you won’t know the reasons. HR Pros shouldn’t apologize for you not getting promoted — but they should help you navigate the political and organizational landscape.
  3. You not liking your boss, your job, your pay. Ugh! We tend to apologize for all these personal “happy” choices a person makes. The last time I checked, I never forced anyone to take a job, or forced them to accept the pay I was offering them, or forced them to work in the occupation or career they chose. These are their own personal choices; if you don’t like it — LEAVE! Go be happy somewhere else. I hope that you’ll be happy here, but I can’t force you to be happy. I’ll try and give you a solid leader, with good pay and challenging work, but sometimes what I see as solid, good and challenging might not meet your expectations. That’s when you need to make a happiness decision!

And 2 things you CAN apologize for

So, what should you apologize for a HR Pro?
I can think of two things that I apologize for on a regular basis:
  1. Things I can control (If I control it, and I screw it up, I need to offer you an apology);
  2. Surprises! (I might not be able to control surprises, but they suck when it comes to business and your livelihood. I apologize for surprises because in HR it’s my job to make sure those don’t happen to you as an employee).
By Tim Sackett, MS, SPHR is Executive Vice President of HRU Technical Resources

Fixing HR: Using Accountability to Transform Good Ideas to Real Results


Human Resources, talent management, human capital. . .
Whatever you call it, it seems that the debate over the importance of good people practices within our organizations has been settled. Even the staunchest HR haters will acknowledge the importance of finding and keeping good people when it comes to running a successful business.
And there is no shortage of solutions available that promise to turn the potential of our employees into the tangible business results that our stakeholders demand. Nearly every organization has a process for attracting, recruiting, training, developing, coaching, motivating, managing and retaining employees. These processes have evolved over decades.
Yet, the associated business results still seem to elude us.

“Houston, we have a problem”

According to the 2011 What’s Working survey by Mercer, it seems that over half of our workforce either hates their job or is planning to find a new one.
Nearly one in three (32 percent) U.S. workers is seriously considering leaving his or her organization at the present time, up sharply from 23 percent in 2005. Meanwhile, another 21 percent are not looking to leave but view their employers unfavorably and have rock-bottom scores on key measures of engagement.”
This at the same time that our CEO’s are reporting that business is suffering due to the organizations inability to find, develop and keep the right talent. As reported in PWC’s 15th Annual Global CEO survey:
Even in a weak labor market, more than 40 percent of U.S. CEOs say their talent-related expenses rose more than expected, a reflection of the acute skills mismatch problem they face: talent shortages amid high unemployment. For almost 60 percent of U.S. CEOs planning to hire this year, it won’t be easy to find the right mix of people. High-potential middle managers and younger workers are particularly difficult to recruit and retain. This is impacting corporate profitability. Almost a quarter of U.S. CEOs say they were unable to pursue a market opportunity and another fifth were unable to innovate effectively because of talent constraints.”
Despite an ever increasing focus on the importance of talent and human resources, our efforts just aren’t meeting the needs of our organizations or the people we want to work there.

Something is missing

Why can’t we solve this talent dilemma? What is it about our human resources processes and solutions that aren’t working?
Sometimes the best ideas and processes don’t deliver the intended results because there’s a major element missing from their execution.

Accountability: HR’s missing piece

In order to achieve optimal performance in any process involving people, it’s important that each person deliver on their responsibility to the process. This requires accountability. Individuals must be accountable both TO the process and FOR their results.
Leaders must both BE accountable to their people and also HOLD their people accountable. When accountability is missing, processes fail and results suffer. Even the most brilliant plans fail when they are poorly executed.
The fundamental challenge underlying the lack of strategic impact in human resources isn’t the lack of good ideas, innovative processes or powerful tools. No, the failure of most HR processes is the total absence of accountability for the employee, manager or even HR in the process. When personal accountability is absent from a people process, it’s doomed to fail.

Personal accountability defined

Personal accountability is the mindset that results happen because of one’s actions, not in spite of them. Accountable people believe that they choose their own destiny. When we talk about personal accountability in HR processes, we aren’t talking about the watered down definition that has become common in business today. This isn’t only about taking the bullet when something goes wrong. True personal accountability is a combination of four factors.
  1. Commitment: The willingness to do whatever it takes to get results.
  2. Resilience: The ability to stay the course in the face of obstacles and setbacks.
  3. Ownership: The acceptance of the consequences of our actions, good or bad.
  4. Continuous Learning: The perspective to see success and failure as learning experiences to fuel future success

Transforming intentions into results

For human resources to live up to its potential and have the impact that will satisfy the CEO, accountability must be designed into the fabric of every HR process.Using our approach, you will find a roadmap for how to begin incorporating accountability into some of the most fundamental HR processes and practices:
  • Performance Appraisals;
  • Employee Engagement;
  • Individual Development Plans;
  • Employee Relations.
By Cy Wakeman -founder and spiritual leader of Bulletproof Talent

5 Basic Truths About Creating and Building Teams in the Workplace


Performance within groups typically does not just happen.
For a group to really perform well, it needs practice. The group needs to understand the best way to organize itself for performance.
This concept is commonly understood by sports teams and the military. They clearly see the need to give groups opportunities to practice. Boot Camp for the military and pre-season workouts for sports teams are the norm.
It’s interesting to note in business that there is far less interest or appreciation of group development and the need for practice. Team practice, for the most part, is not factored into the business or corporate world. We form groups in business and march them into the corporate battle zone expecting them to perform and when they fail we are surprised.

Five basic truths about teams

This whole process was once again revealed to me as my business, CMI, went through the process of putting together a high performance work team. In 2008, we expanded our organization by one. A full 25 percent change growth in our employee numbers. This growth caused a change in our work mix and demands. In essence, we needed less administrative work and more research and marketing.
As we went through the expansion process, some basic truths about teams, groups, and performance helped me traverse this territory.
1. The essence of good work team performance is not good communication or good relationships but a focus on performance and an agreed upon appreciation of what this means.
Typically in the work place people relate to each other socially. This means they are concerned with getting along and staying out of each others hair. This is not how team players relate to each other.
Basically, the difference is between how one relates to people at a barbecue and how one relates to the work group who is trying to win a big contract? The nature of the relationships is quite different. The first is based on the social context of let’s all just get along while the latter is based on the context of let’s get something remarkable done and perform together so that specific results occur.
2. Teams enjoy and play games. The vast majority of employees go to work because they have to in order to survive. That is the culture most adults live in.
This is different than in the world of sports. People voluntarily play the sport because they want to and like the game. When members of teams fundamentally do not like the games or feel connected to the game the group is playing, there will be real performance issues for the group. However, when teams of employees are into the game of making their customers raving fans, magic occurs, and they start enjoying the game.
3. The definition of real teams, from The Wisdom of Teams by John Katzenbach and Douglas Smith, is accurate. They define teams as a small number of people with complementary skills who are equally committed to a common purpose, goals, and working approach for which they hold themselves mutually accountable.
Real teams are a basic unit of performance. Mischief comes from team members who are equally responsible for the result. This is quite different than how most of the work world is organized.
In the typical work place each employee is accountable for their job and they are often formally measured on their performance in the yearly appraisal process. No group or team performance is formally measured or expected. The pretense is that if each employee just does his or her thing it will work out perfectly.
Unfortunately the work world is more complicated and in many cases customers are impacted by a group of employees. When a group takes on being mutually accountable for their customers’ experiences, the group can generate profit and customer loyalty.
4. In sports, different games constitute different types of teams. Soccer, because of the nature of the game, will require a different type of team than baseball.
Work related teams are similar. Depending on the work output of the team and the dynamics of the workplace the type of work team that is required is different. The rules and dynamics that govern the work team will also be different.
5. Teams develop in stages. It is good for participants to be aware of these stages because they normalize the experience of growing and developing into a high performance team. The stages are as follows:
    • Stage A – This is the birth of the group and there is typically some excitement and anticipation about the potential and possibility of the group.
    • Stage B – This is when reality sets in about how group life can be demanding and hard work. It is no longer fun and there is finger pointing between employees. Mutual accountability by most is seen as an empty concept and team members look at who to blame. This is where most teams die and where there is the need for the most support and focus. Commitment needs to be generated to work through the issues. This is also where the employee’s love of the game is needed and counted. For most groups Stage B is where the real work counts and is necessary.
    • Stage C – Getting behind the game stage. This is when everyone begins to align behind the group performance and what needs to happen in order to allow the group to succeed. Real group performance results are for the first time seen.
    • Stage D – This is the high performance stage, where the team is really using its group structure to produce some remarkable results.
By Bruce Hodes, President and Founder of CMI

Make Sure Talent Management Isn't Lost in Translation

Some have called the current time period the Asian Century in recognition of China's growing position in world matters. The continent has achieved significant economic growth since its emergence into the modern era.

With its 1.3 billion people accounting for 34 percent of Asia's population, China is emerging as a global powerhouse, no longer limited by its reputation as the factory of the world. Indeed, China's 12th and current five-year plan (2011-2015) highlights technology, energy, health care and inclusive growth as the government's focal areas for the social and economic development of the nation. Further, with its trading partners in the traditional advanced markets such as the U.S. and Europe still reeling from the global financial crisis and possibly on the precipice of another, China is looking inward to its own consumption potential to fuel future growth.

Multinational corporations (MNCs) look to the East with interest. In a market more than three times the size of the U.S., the profit potential from claiming just a small fraction of market share is seductive, and many global brands are setting up shop to try their hand. From retailers such as Wal-Mart, Carrefour and IKEA, to food franchises such as KFC, McDonald's and Coca-Cola, to technology giants including Microsoft, Google and Yahoo!, and pharmaceutical companies such as Novartis, GSK and Roche, everyone wants a piece of the action.

Growing a cross-border business requires local operations and employees in these markets. While the labor supply might seem endless, in practice, significant shortages of critical skills characterize the emerging markets. China is hamstrung by a severely aging demographic and an education system that has not produced the quantity of quality graduates required to meet business needs. MNCs have responded in part by expatriating critical skills into China, but this is not a sustainable growth strategy, and local talent development remains key to meet future needs.

With labor supply and demand equilibrium so misaligned, talent management is gaining elevated importance. MNCs are importing their global best practices to manage and develop people to accelerate the learning path and tap into the potential of Chinese human capital. However, MNCs may find that not all talent management best practices translate well from West to East, and some may produce the opposite of the intended effect. There are five talent practices talent managers should localize before implementing.

1. Open communication:

Westerners' natural communication style is relatively open and direct. Americans are likely to make their thoughts known, even if they are tempered by tactful or even colorful expressions, rather than suppress them. This is not how Chinese children learn to communicate, so that is not what peers can expect from their Chinese co-workers.

Confucianism, the doctrine for social and political life developed by Chinese philosopher Confucius, is a strong and pervasive influence on Chinese culture. Amongst Confucian values are order, harmony, loyalty, obedience and compassion. As a collectivist culture, the Chinese place community harmony ahead of personal aspirations, so communication that offends group harmony is frowned upon. As a result, Chinese employees prefer to use indirect communication, subtly implying rather than aggressively or explicitly stating their case.

The historical evolution of the Chinese culture also values keeping one's cards close to the chest. It is seen as unwise to be too blunt, to the point or too revealing with information because it could leave one exposed and potentially compromised. Being too revealing also can lead to social judgment or ridicule that may be personally or professionally damaging. Western managers need to temper their drive to state matters bluntly and move too quickly to a solution. The Chinese respect a considered approach, broad consultation within teams and the socializing of ideas and initiatives before charging ahead.

2. Performance feedback:

How can work performance be improved in the absence of feedback on what is currently ineffective? This assumption that performance feedback drives performance improvement meets with surprising resistance in China. Indeed, saving face - mian zi - to protect their own or a co-worker's self-esteem and public dignity is more important to Chinese employees than task or behavioral improvement.

Negative feedback from a manager can instantly result in a loss of face, and if aired publicly among colleagues, especially in the form of sarcasm, criticism or a challenge, will have a damaging effect on personal and professional status. The desire not to offend employees can lead to performance feedback that undermines performance improvement - such as giving favorable performance ratings or feedback, even in the face of poor performance. Or, managers may avoid providing feedback altogether. Expat managers need to be cognizant that saving face is crucial for Chinese employees, so providing feedback in a private, supportive way that is not too critical is necessary.

3. Employee empowerment:

Western best practices aim to enhance employee empowerment wherever possible, devolve decision making to align with functional responsibility and encourage contribution to innovation. Not in China, at least not yet. MNC expatriates likely will have many stories about their failure to instill empowerment into their Chinese workforce. Again, this comes from Chinese cultural roots.

It is only recently that Chinese society has emerged from its most paternalistic communist practices. As recently as 30 years ago, most Chinese lived in closed communities - danwei - run by state-owned enterprises that coordinated every aspect of life, including housing, work, schools, transport and all community services. Individuals subjugated their personal responsibility for these facets of life and obediently served their danwei community as required by leaders who held a tight rein on all activities. An "iron rice bowl" culture resulted, in which employees looked to their superiors to make every decision in return for their security and physical well-being.

Although China is modernizing rapidly and the danwei have been deconstructed, the paternalistic mindset still prevails among many employees, who see it neither as their right nor responsibility to take the level of ownership for work or outcomes consistent with an empowered workforce. MNCs in particular are aiming to change this, but patience and perseverance are necessary.

4. Recognizing high performers:

The collectivist ethos is to put the interests of the group above those of the individual. Those seem to elevate themselves above the group are denounced for inciting disharmony. This communal interest is another of the foundations of Confucianism and is captured in his writings, specifically in the Doctrine of the Mean. This doctrine holds that in the interests of both self-protection and maintaining group harmony, one must avoid extremes - zhong yong - such as taking a strong position on an issue or standing out from the crowd.

The Western ideal of performance excellence as it relates to individuals is therefore out of kilter with this doctrine. The mean is the average, and the closer to average an employee can be, the better that individual will reflect this value. Western managers may be surprised by the reaction they get to overt praise and recognition of one individual in a team. That team member's peers are likely to see him or her as selfish and even a traitor to the group, and he or she may be ostracized. Similarly, rather than accepting the accolades and feeling a sense of achievement, this high performer may seem embarrassed and self-conscious. Some employees even purposely slow their productivity or begin to underperform to regain acceptance. This does not mean the Chinese do not want praise and recognition, but how it is delivered is critical, as is recognition of the group's contribution.

5. Rules of engagement:

One of the most powerful aspects of Chinese culture is the importance placed on relationships. Guan xi is the term used to describe deep personal relationships developed throughout Chinese society and especially in business dealings, and is notable for its defining hallmarks: being personal, reciprocal and long term.

Guan xi relationships are always personal; they are between individuals, not organizations. Each party to the relationship develops a deep understanding of the others' personal background, interests and needs and, over time, takes steps to provide personal favors in line with these. Favors can be small or large, but benefit the individual or his or her family. Examples could be anything from a small gift of a favorite pen through invoking favoritism or nepotism in securing a coveted job for a family member.

Essential to the health of a guan xi relationship is balance between both parties. Once a favor has been done, the recipient is indebted until another is returned. The reciprocal nature of guan xi works like a balance sheet. The third element is that a guan xi relationship is built to last and usually endures over many years or decades. In this regard, it differs from Western business relationships, which may exist for a specific purpose or because the parties hold certain organizational roles.

A typical Western criticism of guan xi is the subjective bias it can place on what would otherwise be objective business dealings. At the extreme, guan xi can result in abuse of power and other forms of corruption. However, Western leaders in MNCs must appreciate the ingrained nature of guan xi in Chinese society and understand how to work effectively and ethically within it.

Implementing global practices without considering the unique challenges and business environment in China has led many MNCs to suboptimal outcomes. While language is important, a thorough understanding of the culture and values of Chinese society are even more so.

Preparing expatriates to facilitate their personal and professional integration in China is a must. What many Western leaders have developed in their leadership toolkit to increase employees' motivation and productivity may meet with disappointing results without the appropriate adaptation to the Chinese market.

Glocalization recognizes that neither markets nor people are homogenous. While MNCs develop sophisticated global business strategies, their successful implementation requires a thorough understanding of local environments. Effective talent management requires an empathetic understanding of the unique traits and backgrounds of the workforce to release its full potential.

By Sylvia Vorhauser-Smith senior vice president of research for PageUp People

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Do You Know the Truth About Checking References?


When it comes to checking job applicant references, you might reasonably think that a great reference means you’ll be getting a great employee.
You might also think a bad reference means you should cross the applicant off your list.
However, it’s often just as true that people who come with great references turn out to be duds on the job, and people with poor references could very well be great employees.
Here are a few reasons why an employer might give a bad reference on a great person:
  1. To try to keep the employee onboard and give the employer the opportunity to make a counter-offer.
  2. To keep the employee from taking his/her skillsand experience to the competition.
  3. Because the former employer is holding a grudge against the employee who left (retaliatory discrimination).

Why bother with reference, anyway?

Here are a few reasons why an employer might give a good reference on a poor employee:
  1. The employer wants to get the poor performer off the payroll.
  2. To avoid the potential legal liabilities of giving a bad reference.
  3. To “make up” for firing or laying the person off.
By Mel Kleiman, CSP, is an internationally-known authority on recruiting, selecting, and hiring hourly employees. 

6 Ways Your Inconsistent Leadership Is Negatively Impacting Your Employees


One of the key causes of poor performing employees is inconsistent leadership, and if you’re hearing employee gossip that says “it’s not their fault there are problems at the office,”they might be right.
An inconsistent leader is sometimes there, sometimes not. They appear at times to be physically present when their brain has left the building. Sometimes they listen, sometimes they blow up. They are at times empathetic and at others an unbearable taskmaster.
If your behavior is all over the board, it’s likely their performance is too, and the following problems are showing up. What’s the fix? Keep reading.

6 ways you are negatively impacting employees

  • They don’t trust you. The leaders who blow up at one person but listen intently to another are creating employees afraid to approach you. They lack trust in your counsel or guidance or words that say “my door is always open,” and no matter how often you persuade them to share, they’ll stop trusting that you actually care.
  • They skip levels. If you have one team member who seems to have befriended your boss, this is not cause for alarm. But, when the majority of the team signs up for the skip-level luncheon, pay attention as it may be a cry for guidance they no longer believe could come from you.
  • They ignore your first direction. Tantrums and explosions scare people, and if you’re prone to huffy moments where you spout off some angry words, employees will begin to brace for impact. For protection of their own sanity, they’ll start ignoring what you say when you’re the most annoyed. Then you’ll have to apologize, explain your behavior and likely repeat your direction which can be, well, annoying.
  • They nod their head, but don’t agree. Those employees gifted at empathy and afraid of conflict will never tell you to your face that they don’t understand your direction or why you’re acting out of character today. Instead, they’ll simply nod and smile and you’ll think that means yes, they understand, and will take action — when they’re really simply trying to keep you from acting scary.
  • They mimic (cold) molasses. Have you ever seen how fast cold molasses moves? That’s about how fast employees will get to work on something when your direction or behavior is inconsistent. All of their time and energy will be spent venting, talking about, or stewing over your irregular moods or missteps and work won’t get done. Or in the case of you being inconsistently at the office, they may learn to act as if their busily working when you’re their only to go back to the speed of cold molasses when you’re away.
  • They ALL appear difficult. It is one thing to recognize you have a challenge in one team member. and quite another to think “Make Difficult People Disappear” applies to your entire team. If they all are acting difficult, chances are the problem is not them, but with their leader. Check your perceptions and then check in the mirror.
By Monica Wofford, CSP, is a leadership development strategist, blogger, speaker, and author of Contagious Leadership and Make Difficult People Disappear

4 Things to Consider When You’re Ready to Hire


When you make the final hire/don’t hire decision, there are four (4) important things to consider:
  1. The results of testing should count for 30 percent;
  2. The interview should count for 30 percent;
  3. The results of the reference check should count for 30 percent;
  4. Your feeling, intuition, and opinion should count for only 10 percent (Why? Because no matter how hard you try to eliminate your biases, they may still have undue influence.)
If the applicant scores poorly in any one of these areas, it’s a deal breaker.
However, an exceptional rating in any one area shouldn’t, on its own, get someone hired. You’ll want to have good or better ratings for all four criteria before you make an offer of employment.
By Mel Kleiman, CSP, is an internationally-known authority on recruiting, selecting, and hiring hourly employees.

The 4 Factors Critical to a Smart Total Rewards Program


1. Enhancing employee engagement

My view: As engagement gains more and more acceptance in the broader community, there are also more and more detractors. This is to be expected as too many focus on the “engagement survey” and not enough on what the survey reveals or the actions taken as a result of the survey.
But as this research shows, HR pros clearly understand that true engagement efforts draw employees deeper into the culture and expectations of the organization, helping them contribute in more meaningful, valuable and worthwhile ways.

2. Quantifying HR impact on the organization

My view: “What gets measured, gets respected.” This twist on the common aphorism is of even more importance to the HR community as they are often shunted aside as the “party planners” who deal with “the complainers.” Moving out of this perception requires proving the impact of HR efforts in numbers the CFO cares about – the direct impact on the bottom line.

3. Effectively communicating

My view: One of the most common complaints from employees is a lack of communication from management, especially on greater context for changing priorities and strategies. HR pros can play a critical role in helping to train managers to be better communicators, but they can also take steps to better communicate key messages more directly themselves through programs under their direct control, such as strategic recognition that’s focused on organization priorities and objectives.

4. Tying rewards to business strategy

My view: We all understand that we are paid for the work we do. But we become much more convicted in that work when we understand the underlying importance and value of our contributions to overall organization success. This requires every employee both knowing the business strategy and knowing how they contribute to achieving it.
Again, HR pros can help with a strategic recognition program that makes strategic objectives the central focus. In this way, employees are recognized frequently and in a timely way any time they contribute to achieving the strategy in line with company values.
By Derek Irvine is Vice President, Client Strategy & Consulting Service at Globoforce

Interview Like a Kid, Hire Like a Grown-up


Preparing for an in-person interview can be one of the most nerve-wracking experiences throughout the hiring process.
And interview nerves aren’t just limited to your candidate. As an interviewer, you’re probably eager to make a good impression and ask all of the right questions.
You might think that you should have your phasers set to “professional” when it comes to interviews, and while that’s true to a degree, you’d be surprised at how much more successful your interviews can be when you regress back to your Kindergarten mindset. The ironic thing about Kindergartners is that —while they’re just beginning their education — they’re already experts on so much.
Yep, that’s right: grab your finger paint and use your inside voice, because we’re going to tell you how interviewing like a kid can bring you some very grown-up triumphs in your hiring process.

1. Always ask “Why?”

Now, if you’ve spent any time around kids, you know that they aren’t afraid to ask questions (… and more questions, and MORE questions) until their curiosity is fully satisfied. If the candidate offers up a piece of his or her background (“I went to Ohio University for undergrad …”), why not ask why?
Keep in mind the tone with which kids as these types of questions (with genuine intent, not as a challenge), and you might open doors you had no idea were even there. Just, uh, try to shy away from too many “Why?” questions in a row. Rapid fire “Why?”s are only ever cute when they’re coming from a toddler, and … honestly? Even then, it’s not that cute.
If you’re lucky, your “Why?” questions will open up a whole treasure trove of information about your candidate, and might even reveal to you some skills, interests, and experiences that didn’t make it onto the résumé.

2. Play show and tell

Capitalizing on that opportunity means one thing: it’s time for show and tell. When you stumble across something about which your candidate seems knowledgeable and passionate, ask them to tell you more, to teach you about it.
Everyone you interview will be an expert on something, and asking them to explain their interests and expertise to you will show you how they communicate (and how they educate), and who knows — you might even learn something. Ew! Learning! KNOWLEDGE COOTIES!
Ahem. Sorry. It’s easy to over-borrow from the young’uns sometimes.

3. Lose your attention span

If a candidate is taking longer than 30 seconds to answer a question (and isn’t being prompted by you for more information), then time is being wasted. Your average five-year-old would be wandering over the Play-Doh bucket after 30 seconds of listening to his peer drone on and on, so don’t play into long-winded responses from your interviewees. A time constraint on responses forces your candidate to think creatively and indicates how well they can cut to the chase (or, alternatively, how well they can dance around a question).
Interviewing is as much about how an interviewee response as it is about the content of that response. Prompt them to be succinct so you can quickly and efficiently get to the meat of the conversation.

4. Don’t sugar coat your business

Last but not least, adopt a childlike policy on honesty. Kids are connoisseurs at brutal honesty (“Yes, I know she said you look like a Weeble, ma’am, but she’s only 4 years-old.”) and it’s something to consider when bringing new people into your company. Always be aware of managing expectations; your office, like every other one, isn’t perfect. But it can be an incredibly rewarding place to pursue a great mission.
If you feel as though the candidate is disqualifying themselves in the interview, bring it up. If you can’t be honest from the get-go, you’re not setting yourself up well for any kind of potential relationship in the future. Be upfront with the fact that you want to make sure they’re a good fit in their role and your company, and make sure you point out it’s for their benefit as well as your own.
Not to mention the fact that withholding information is basically the same as lying, and if we’re playing by kids’ rules here, I’m afraid that means your pants are most unfortunately on fire. Deal with it.
By Gayle Pazerski is a blogger at The Resumator,

Translate